“What really burns me” “if you can’t speak English you can’t drive a truck” a truck driver’s perspective

  • Executive order from President Trump that says You need to speak English to work here

What really burns me

 

I believe that I have a unique perspective on this executive order that was signed into law by President Trump stating that all truck drivers have to have a firm grasp on the English language Read write and speak.

I have a unique perspective as I am a truck driver, owner operator, with my own business, and I see everyday now, that this type of executive order should have been implemented long ago.

I’ll put this in a perspective that might make all of you understand why this is a good thing. I drove truck overseas and no not just for the military I drove in Germany and all around Europe from Italy all the way up to Ireland Scotland and England and I did so with a German CDL.

After I got out of the military I took what was called a European out I was an expat. When I got out I decided that I wanted to go and drive a semi which was one of the best things I’ve ever done but to do that in Germany, guess what I have to do, I have to speak read and write German I have to understand the language I have to understand The road signs other drivers and the laws and I have to understand them in German. I had to take the driving test in German I had to also learn something that’s called hochedeutsch which is a higher form of German lovingly referred to as business German. That way when I communicated with shippers and receivers I would have a higher understanding of the language and know more business German to be able to do the job correctly.

But that is something we don’t have here in America we do not force people that come here to this country to speak English, we used to, but that was for those who were trying to become citizens. Now you don’t have to do that anymore if you don’t believe me just look at the over 15 million illegal immigrants that don’t speak English.

I don’t know if you knew this but in New York City and many other cities across America you can take the driving test in multiple different languages languages such as Spanish Korean Farsi Chinese and many others. Taking the test in your own language defeats the purpose of having a driving test if you can’t read the signs or speak to anyone in English What are you going to do when there’s an emergency involving yourself or how about what are you going to say to the EMS or police when something goes wrong on the road What are you going to say when someone dies because you couldn’t read a sign and just happened to go down the wrong road and have a head on collision with someone?

I used to see it sporadically but now I see it almost daily where some driver is at a shipper or receiver holding out their phone with a translating app talking to the shipper or receiver. And it’s all fine and good You have a translator there but the time that it takes that to translate a conversation back and forth could be the time necessary to save someone’s life or the time necessary for you to be able to read a sign and stop from going down the wrong road and causing an accident or God forbid something worse.

President Trump has given the FMCSA (Federal motor Carrier safety administration). 60 days to find these folks who don’t speak the English language with enough fluency to hold a CDL and revoke their license and I 100% agree.

If you go to a foreign country for any length of time longer than a vacation You are made to learn their language, speak read and write it. And out of respect you should That’s the problem here is the people that come here don’t have any respect for us for our language and for the families and people traveling our highways.

I hope that President Trump cracks down on them and makes sure that the FMCSA actually goes out there and starts pulling licenses if you don’t speak the language if you can’t read the signs you can’t write down any information You don’t deserve a CDL there are times when you receive a bill of lading that you have to be able to read it and follow the instructions on it or you could get violated and lose your license anyway.

To the states That give the licenses out if they don’t speak English they don’t get to take the test. give it to them in English and only English no second languages no third languages this is an English-speaking country and we should be demanding English speaking drivers both car and semi trucks

That’s “what really burns me”

Thomas Domich

“What really burns me” “The core of the problem”

Auto parts stores. Fraud? Scam?

the “CORE” of the problem.

 

This is “what really burns me”.

 

If You have ever leased or currently Make monthly payments for, or own outright a vehicle, then You have been through this, most likely, multiple times. Especially if you do a lot of your own repairs.

If you haven’t guessed it already I’m talking about CORE charges.

That is the added extra charge that can make your bill go from the cost of the part, which is exorbitantly high in this day and age, to a price that is, for some, unaffordable at the moment. But no worries It comes with the promise of reimbursement for total cost of the core which is for those that don’t know, The part that is being replaced or the damaged part.

All auto parts stores do this You buy a new part to replace one that is damaged, but you have to return the damaged part to the store Where you bought the new one to get your money back. On what is called a core charge.

So they want you to bring a damaged part to the store where you buy the new one but they charge you money before you bring it back and they promise you a reimbursement as an incentive to bring them the broken part.

This used to be something that I had no issues with until I did a little bit of digging. This core charge has been going on for a long time. Even before you could buy used, reworked,  remanned, or refurbished, parts from the store.

It had always been something that you would have to buy from a junkyard if you wanted a used part, which of course has restrictions by the government that state certain parts can not be reused regardless of how good of a condition they were in.

What the auto parts companies were doing, was taking those cores, reworking  or rebuilding them, whatever was necessary to put them into a good condition of usability and reselling them at close to full price.

After a long time they started to sell these parts for a little bit less money and they would call them remanned or rebuilt or refurbished, and the stores themselves would sell them.

People would buy those parts to save a little bit of money because they did cost less than brand new parts.

Here’s the problem, if a person owns something then that person owns every single part of that something. As in vehicles if I own a vehicle then I own every part of that vehicle, broken or otherwise.

So to charge me a core charge, regardless if I’m going to be reimbursed or not, is not something that should be automatic or forced.

The auto parts stores will automatically put that into your bill of sale charge you automatically and if you say no that you’re not going to pay a core charge, then they will not sell you the new part until you’re willing to pay the core charge, or basically a promise (by monetary force), And in that way they are forcing you to bring them that part that is broken. And yes I know you’re saying that “they are going to reimburse you” which is true if that always happens.

So they force you to bring back that part and usually about 70% of the time you will get your reimbursement. The rest does not happen. I myself have spent months even a year or more waiting for a reimbursement, on one part, and I’ve never received it but I digress.

They force you to bring them that broken part so they can fix it and resell it.

But now things are changing and a lot of the auto parts stores will not sell the reworked or refurbished parts but they still want to continue to charge you for the core.

Now here’s the fun part they no longer sell the refurbished parts,  but still charge you for a core, and expect you to bring that core back or lose that money.  And they still refurbish the parts but they package and sell them as brand new.

And I know you’re not going to believe that but it’s happening in the trucking industry and it’s starting to happen with regular vehicles.

So you say, “what if a person doesn’t want to pay the core charge”?  then you will not be able to buy the new part and if you don’t bring back the core of course you lose that extra money that you pay on the original sale. And with some parts, the core charge is almost as much as the new parts charge, up to 90%.

So you’ll pay almost double for one new part because you decide you want to keep the broken part. maybe reuse it, repair it yourself and put it in another vehicle, or for any other reason you so desire.

It is your part, right?

Then that comes down to the auto industry itself and those who make these parts. They make things harder and harder to fix on your own because they would lose money. Auto mechanics and shops would lose money, and then the dealerships mechanics, and shops would lose a fortune.

So the harder it is for you to fix on your own the better for them therefore they still charge core charges, to manipulate that part from you,  so you don’t try to fix it yourself and they resell it as a new part. They almost double their money because they’re selling a part twice and you lose almost double your money on the price of a new part because, if you refuse to bring back the core, which you own, You get no reimbursement.

I think the auto industry and the auto parts industry make more than enough money in this world than to have to turn around and force us to give them money for a used or damaged part so they can refurbish it and then resell it.

I’m sorry if I own it I will only give it to you if I choose to, and not because you try to manipulate me. It is my property therefore I do not have to give you any part of it. And you will not charge me money, as a so-called “incentive” to bring back something that I own and give it to you for free. Because that’s what it is, after you reimburse me my money for the piece of property that I own. You’re still taking that core that means it’s a free part for you to fix and resell.

I may be making this harder for myself to buy new parts but I will never ever pay a court charge again until they start selling, in the store, reworked parts, labeled as such, not reworked parts selling them as new while still taking the core which is still  your property to continue that cycle

That’s “What really burns me”

Thomas Domich

 

 

 

Fostoria Councilwoman Mendoza Launches ‘Convos With Council’ for Public Engagement

FOSTORIA – Amy Mendoza, Ward 1 councilwoman and public affairs committee chair, has maintained communication with the public via social media. Currently, Mendoza is the only member of Fostoria City Government actively engaging with people on Facebook.

The launch of a quarterly informal meeting with council members is a major step forward in ensuring accountability.

Amy Mendoza was unanimously appointed to serve a 4-year term as the Ward 1 city councilperson commencing January 2022.

She has lived in Fostoria her entire adulthood. Amy married her high school sweetheart and together, they have raised their family here. The majority of both their extended families live in Fostoria as well. Councilperson Mendoza has lived in Ward 1 since 2007 and has no intentions of ever moving. Fostoria is her home.

Amy works full-time as the Youth Defense Administrator/Intake Specialist at Hancock County Public Defender’s Office where she has been employed for the past 13 years. She helps indigent clients who are often facing difficult situations with emotional outcomes through empathy, caring, and leading.

Amy has a Notary Public Commission and received a Certificate for Administration and Certificate of Completion for Workforce and Community Services through Owens Community College. She is a 2023 graduate of Hancock County Leadership, 2024 graduate of Leadership Seneca County, and active Staying Ahead Mentor.

Councilperson Mendoza is passionate about her community and helping our town continue on the path for a more prosperous future, which she is very excited about.

FOSTORIA: Evergreen Poplar LLC / Poplar Village Refuses to Correct Standing Raw Sewage

SPLASH PAD: Fostoria Vision 2020 Inc. Concealing Financial Information

Fostoria Vision 2020 Inc. rejects public records request for financial information, claims records don’t exist.

Broken Promises & Hidden Financials: Splash Pad, Fostoria Vision 2020, Parks & Rec, Airport

During the May 21st Fostoria City Council meeting, concerned citizen & business owner Jill Filliator raises concerns about financial transparency.

-Fostoria under-budgeted the splash pad by nearly 100%

-Fostoria Vision 2020 Inc. refused to provide financial public records.

-Fostoria chooses to create a board for the municipal airport but ignores lack of  a parks & rec board.

 

 

The City of Fostoria’s Un-Documented Partnership with Scanner Media: A Conflict of Interest and a Risk to Public Trust

PROBE: Fostoria Volunteer Performing Duties of City Public Relations Officer

Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 14:15:04 -0400
Subject: Clarification Needed: Volunteer Performing Duties of City Public Relations Officer
From: The Fostoria Free Press <thefostoriafreepress@gmail.com>
To: "FostoriacouncilmanShaver@gmail.com" <FostoriacouncilmanShaver@gmail.com>, lawdirector@fostoriaohio.gov
Cc: mayor@fostoriaohio.gov

Hi Stephanie & Mr Shaver,

I have found the following to be true:

1. Zach/Scanner Media is performing some of the normal duties of a city
public relations officer.

2. There are *no* clear and official/written duties for Zach.

3. The volunteer runs a news & media website and has 30,000 Facebook
followers, and 11K YouTube followers.

4. The volunteer has access to the City YouTube Account

5. The volunteer profits from "Scanner Media"s YouTube account. (seeattached)

6. The volunteer=E2=80=99s public duties benefits the online image of Scanner Media.

7. The volunteer is receiving special treatment as a media company- with
camera angle privileges during meetings that other reporters do not
receive.

8. The volunteer discriminated against interviewing mayoral candidate
Shaffer prior to the last election.

   A. What date Will the city go on record that Zach begin conducting
duties for the city?

       1. If he was acting on behalf of the city for anything during
election season- It is my understanding that there are potential civil
rights violations. This is in regards to choosing to only interview the
current mayor and not his candidate.



Has the city discussed the potential risks that this situation poses to the
City of Fostoria?  Why is the City maintaining a relationship that poses a
clear conflict of interest?  Is Zach subjected to Public Record requests?

Considering the lack of written duties there is 0% transparency on the
relationship between the City & Scanner Media/Zach. There are also no
official guidelines delineating the boundaries of duties.

 I would like to request at a bare *minimum *that a document is created to
clarify in detail: duties, responsibilities, and admin access privileges
for City online accounts.

Before retaining an attorney I am reaching out to give the City an
opportunity to thoroughly examine all risks & declare all conflicts of
interest in written form.

Respectfully,

Anonymous.

--000000000000dc18fb0618963669
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mennel & Keckler Fall Short on Boasted ‘Idea’ – City of Fostoria Raises $1.1 Mil in Donations & Pledges Without First Collecting Any Construction Bids