New Ohio Law Sends 36% of Cannabis Dispensary Excise Tax Revenue to Local Municipalities
On December 19, 2025, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed Senate Bill 56 (SB 56) into law, marking a significant update to the state’s recreational cannabis framework established by voter-approved Issue 2 in 2023. This new legislation not only addresses long-standing issues with tax revenue distribution but also introduces stricter controls on cannabis products and bans unregulated “intoxicating hemp” items. At its core, the law ensures that 36% of the 10% excise tax revenue from dispensary sales flows directly to local municipalities and townships hosting recreational dispensaries, potentially unlocking over $80 million in previously withheld funds.
Background: From Voter Approval to Revenue Stalemate
Ohio’s journey with recreational cannabis began when voters passed Issue 2 in November 2023, legalizing possession, cultivation, and sales for adults 21 and older. The initiative imposed a 10% excise tax on cannabis sales, in addition to standard state and local sales taxes. Originally, the revenue was allocated as follows:
- 36% to the Host Community Cannabis Fund for municipalities with dispensaries.
- 36% to a Cannabis Social Equity and Jobs Fund to support communities disproportionately affected by past drug policies.
- 25% to a Substance Abuse and Addiction Fund.
- 3% to the Division of Cannabis Control for administrative costs.
Recreational sales launched on August 6, 2024, generating substantial revenue—estimated at nearly $50 million annually for host communities alone. However, a technical loophole in the law—no explicit legislative appropriation—led to the state withholding distributions. By mid-2025, this created friction, with local governments in limbo and over $80 million in collected taxes sitting undistributed. Republican-led efforts to amend the law stalled repeatedly over debates on hemp regulation and funding priorities.
SB 56: Key Provisions on Revenue and Beyond
SB 56 resolves the distribution impasse by providing the necessary appropriation, allowing the release of withheld funds starting 90 days after signing (around March 19, 2026). The bill maintains the 10% excise tax rate and preserves the 36% allocation to the Host Community Cannabis Fund, ensuring local governments with dispensaries receive their share in perpetuity. This could provide a financial boon to municipalities, funding infrastructure, public safety, or other local needs.
However, the law significantly alters the remaining allocations. Instead of dividing the other 64% among social equity programs, substance abuse initiatives, and administration, it redirects most of these funds to Ohio’s general revenue fund. This shift has drawn criticism from advocates who argue it undermines the voter intent behind Issue 2’s equity focus.
Beyond revenue, SB 56 introduces sweeping reforms:
- Hemp Ban: Prohibits sales of “intoxicating hemp” products (e.g., delta-8 THC edibles or beverages) outside licensed dispensaries, aligning with federal changes. Governor DeWine vetoed a provision that would have allowed THC-infused drinks to continue for a year, accelerating the ban.
- THC Limits: Caps THC content in flower at 35% and extracts at 70% (down from 90%), aiming to reduce potency.
- Public Use and Penalties: Bans public consumption and adds criminal penalties for certain possession violations.
- Dispensary Caps and Buffers: Limits total dispensaries to 400 statewide and requires buffers from schools, playgrounds, and churches.
- Oversight: Places adult-use marijuana under the Division of Cannabis Control for stronger regulation.
Impact on Local Municipalities and the Industry
For local governments, the 36% share represents a critical influx. Communities like Wintersville have voiced frustration over the delay, with officials noting the funds could support essential services. With sales booming—Ohio dispensaries reported over $200 million in recreational revenue in the first year—the annual payout could exceed $50 million for host areas.
The hemp ban, however, could disrupt small businesses. Critics, including hemp advocates, argue it destroys livelihoods just before the holidays, potentially driving consumers to unregulated markets. Opponents have vowed repeal efforts, citing the veto on beverages as particularly manipulative.
Public Reaction and Future Outlook
Reactions on social media platform X highlight a divide. The Ohio Senate GOP praised the bill for protecting children and communities, while others decried it as overreach, potentially boosting black-market sales. Advocacy groups like Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom called the timing “diabolical,” and resources from Ohio State University’s Drug Enforcement and Policy Center have been updated to reflect the changes.
As Ohio navigates these reforms, the law balances revenue distribution with tighter controls, but it may face legal challenges or further amendments. For now, local municipalities stand to gain significantly, even as the broader cannabis landscape evolves.


